A year into his term, he still refuses to assume any ownership of the problems facing our country. Hey, he wanted the job, someday he should step up, show some leadership, and own the problem(s).|||No,of course not. Every president has inherited the problems,they don't disappear when the previous president leaves office.
Of course he now "owns" the problems,but does he need to state the obvious?
What problems would you say he created? In your own opinion of course.|||Ronald Reagan was blaming Jimmy Carter for everything well into his second term.
Any intellectually honest person would have to recognize that the global financial catastrophe did not start on the day Obama was inaugurated. It was there, mostly due to G.W. Bush, on the day Obama took office.
True accountability would put it on Bush not Obama.
Bush was a Reagan wannabe who believed in Wild Wild West no regulation. So his SEC did not work. His Fed did not work. His FDIC did not work. It was all Wild Wild West.
The same man who put G.W. Bush into office (Antonin Scalia) just decided that Big Banks and Big Oil can give whatever they want to political campaigns and ads. Could the Pope please be so kind as to excomunicate Antonin Scalia for being a totally evil Gummba Thug? I doubt it. I think the Vatican has shares in Exxon and in Chase.
Bottom line -- Reagan was not justified in blaming Jimmy, a good man, a hapless man, but if ever a President had valid basis to blame the guy before him Obama has to blame G.W. Bush, a moron, a dry drunk on a Bible crutch, a silver spoon New England boy foisting himself off as a Texas coyboy, what a joke. I'm the only one that could see this right?
Short answer: No, your partisan attack is misplaced, go back to Glenn Beck do not collect $200. Obama can legitimately claim that G.W. Bush left him a lot of problems, and true accountability would not deny this obvious truth.|||No. The Bush administration was still blaming Clinton during their last year in power, yet conservatives still sing praises about their leadership. It would be hypocritical for conservatives to claim that "blaming Bush" is a sign of a total lack of leadership, especially after only one year in office.|||I agree. America needs a leader. We need a man or woman who can stand up and MAKE DECISIONS -- America needs a leader who will be financially responsible and scold our current politicians for their outrageous financial irresponsibility. We need a leader who believes in capitalism and the strength of the free markets to decide which companies fail and which succeed. We need a leader who will say that the recent $300 Million payoff to the Louisiana Senator is wrong and corrupt and that it WILL NOT OCCUR! Where is our leader?
America needs a leader who can be a role model. A person who doesn’t lie or manipulate everyday. A person who is not bribe-able. A person who is their own person, makes their own decisions and who is NOT part of a special interest machine that is trying to redistribute the wealth of America. Someone who is not controlled by the money of others. America needs a leader to stand tall and speak of values and principles and one that will hold Congress to these principles as they do their best everyday to uphold the Constitution.
America needs a financially responsible, common sense, small government proponent - a person of principles, unswayed by the corruption and money available to them. o_O|||Today is a sound bite, out of context world. You wouldn't do it if the shoe was on the other foot, and I know that because I can profile you just from your question alone.|||All I got to say is Obama can you make me tax exempt too?
I just can't give you an answer he just is a fake, just like most government elected officials..|||amen, just this am on the news he was talking about inheriting the problems that led to coakly losing in ma. now how was that bushes problem?|||“Independent” which is really “Decline to State” or “No Party”|||blame is root belief of a lib
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment